Recently, a client asked me what my ideal home would look like and where I would build it. My answer was that I would construct one or two Scandinavian-style, rectangular units that are easy and quick to build, highly insulated, use sustainable and healthy materials and the house is truly energy efficient with little or no heating or cooling required. I even mentioned the possibility of being off-grid and then scratched my head.
I explained that I would prefer to build in the countryside because I love the privacy and habitat, but not too far away from the city. I would also opt for single-story units that are not too large. I would use super insulated walls, floors and roof, possibly using structural insulated panels (SIPS) and a mass-timber portal frame if required.
When asked about achieving a passive design certification, I said no. My client looked surprised, but my design and building experience in New Zealand in particular has taught me that ‘most’ builders are not able to achieve that standard without charging high prices. Instead, I would aim for 90% passive house standard, always considering cost versus benefit.
We ended up in quite a debate that unearthed some interesting comments and questions. So I’m curious to know, what is your ideal home? What size do you prefer and why? How do you balance factors such as size, location, building systems, material choice, sustainability, health benefits, local infrastructure and living style? Have you come across any building systems or styles abroad that you think could work well and be more cost-effective than what is available locally? How do you balance all these factors to create your perfect home? I would love to hear your thoughts and perspectives.
